Snipa

[TimAlerts] MDGS could do a lot of things to get their price up, including a reverse split, so a listing requirement notice isn't necessarily a good thing, imo

Phil_Pho

[TimAlerts] would the fact that MDGS got a bid price listing requirement notice a few days back change anything?

Phil_Pho

[TimAlerts] might be worth noting that about a week ago MDGS receieved a NASDAQ compliance letter stating they need to meet a minimum of $1/share for a minimum of 10 days straight

AngelTrades

[TimAlerts] Sending you the news on MDGS. "today announced that it received the first purchase order (PO) for the MUSE™ system in Italy from INNOVAMEDICA S.p.A, a privately-owned distributor of minimally invasive medical devices, in accordance with their existing distribution agreement.Under terms of the four-year agreement which took effect January 1st 2017, INNOVAMEDICA S.p.A. will be required to purchase at least EUR 1M of Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler (MUSE™)" It is a contract win but man If

Phil_Pho

[TimAlerts] would anyone agree with me that due to the letter sent by NASDAQ to MDGS about minimum bid price compliance, and the "news" that has come out this morning, that they will attempt to pump up the price?

Duderino

[TimAlerts] I was observing $mdgs and it didn't do anything after opening with ok news. Can anyone explain to me why this is?

Page
of 29